Total Pageviews

Join SIF yahoogroup, get answers..

Join SIF yahoogroup"

Monday, September 18, 2006

Proposal / Amendment : Please read, compare and support.


Proposal / Amendment : Please read, compare and support.


Instead of NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN

Exact suggestions exist at

http://mynation.net/proposal. htm

in contrast to

http://ncw.nic.in/page1. htm

Please read, compare and support.

Thanking you.

SAchit Dalal




--
Sachit Dalal
+91-9871734980
My favourite websites :
www.saveindianfamily.org ;
http://www.mynation.net
Read latest News at www.mynation.net/mynews

Disclaimer : These are my personal views. Your views could be different. I do not hold myself liable for any consequences, legal or otherwise, arising out of use of any such information.

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

AajTak Team 2 : Fwd: Abhilasha v/s Manu

"AajTak" team broadcasted one sided story

Shame On Aaj tak team for broadcasting one sided
story.
Below is a mail from one of respectible Save Indian
Family member.

Sachit Dalal

--- Indian Husbands <indianhusbands@yahoo.com> wrote:

> To: vaardaat@aajtak.com, amitabh.sinha@aajtak.com,
> amitabh.srivastava@aajtak.com,
> anil.singh@aajtak.com,
> ashwani.hellan@aajtak.com,
> deepak.chaurasia@aajtak.com,
> deepak.sharma@aajtak.com,
> jagmohan.batula@aajtak.com,
> kirpal.singh@aajtak.com,
> pragiya.tewari@aajtak.com, rafay.sultan@aajtak.com,
> rajiv.gupta@aajtak.com, rohit.mathur@aajtak.com,
> sanjay.bragta@aajtak.com,
> sanjeevk@aajtak.com, satender.negi@aajtak.com,
> shashi.dhondiyal@aajtak.com,
> suman.kansra@aajtak.com,
> tahir.chowdhary@aajtak.com,
> vehrnon.ibrahim@aajtak.com,
> kavita.sharma@aajtak.com
> CC: ipc 498a <ipc-498a@yahoogroups.com>, sif core
> <sif-core@yahoogroups.com>,
> india force <india-force@yahoogroups.com>,
> saveindianfamily group
> <saveindianfamily@yahoogroups.com>,
> harassed husband
> <harassedhusband@yahoogroups.com>,
> ihro <ihro@yahoogroups.com>,
> branded indian <branded_indian@yahoogroups.com>,
> mens issues <mensissuesonline@yahoogroups.com>,
> indian justice <indianjustice@yahoogroups.com>,
> stop misuse <stopmisuse498a@yahoogroups.com>,
> sif mp <sif-mp@yahoogroups.com>, sif mumbai
> <sif-mumbai@yahoogroups.com>,
> sif pune <sif-pune@yahoogroups.com>,
> "sif-hope4men@yahoogroups.com"
> <sif-hope4men@yahoogroups.com>,
> praja vol <praja-vol@yahoogroups.com>
> From: Indian Husbands <indianhusbands@yahoo.com>
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: [SaveIndianFamily] Abhilasha v/s Manu
>
> Dear Aaj Tak Team,
>
> Your regular viewers viewed your Programme about
> the matrimonial dispute of Abhilasha V/s Manu.
> Infact it is the talk of the town by virtue of the
> popularity of your channel.
>
> We understand that yours is a responsible channel
> but what we are failing to understand is, in the
> pursuit of sabse tez did you forget to cross check
> on the innocence of the accused husband? The viewers
> who contacted us were at the mercy of the limited
> information that was being telecasted, public
> opinions are formed too because of your
> declarations.
>
> We are not siding any one here but definately we
> cannot take a channel declaring the accused as the
> hidden devil without investigation and if you have
> done that then we would request sufficient proofs.
> Because the Guilty should be punished and the
> innocent should not be troubled.
>
> Your reports are taken seriously by junta, but
> what if the same junta is victimised? You cannot be
> irresponsible by pretending sleep on 498a issue.
> This law is exempted from the evidence act and hence
> mandatory arrests are being made, rather you should
> highlight such issue nuetrally, along with such
> reports.
>
> Good thing is after seeing that program, one would
> believe that women can utter bad words too, what
> ever be the reason. Thanks for being bold on
> reveling this though she was talking about how the
> husband abused. Because people otherwise would find
> it hard to believe that a girl could utter badwords
> too.
>
> It was also noticed that Abhilasha was
> unconvincing and unable to answer the straight
> queries made by your channel about "What she wanted
> after all this?" and she kept on telling that "she
> wants justice" but then in such cases title given to
> this news feature about justice to Abhilasha also
> raises questions.
>
> Infact, our movement called "Save Indian Family" -
> Mumbai Chapter had called for a meeting of various
> Associations of Affected families. Even Aaj Tak was
> invited by us, using the press club of india Fax
> service to listen to the issues "elder abuse and
> family abuse by the abuse of law" under section 498a
> on 13th August 2006 at Press Club of India Mumbai
> (2.00pm). But there was no one from your channel
> interested in this "Politically Incorrect" Issue
> which is seriously marred by the misuse in reality.
> (this movement is started by the victimised families
> to fight against the false 498a allegations made by
> the DIL causing arrests of innocent parents and
> siblings of the husband there is nothing done at the
> level of law to combat the misuse).
>
> Prima Facie, the judicial system is being fooled,
> this is proven over the years by conviction rate in
> single digits. But media can't be fooled like this
> and neither it can fool around with the given air
> time.
>
> Please send your reply to your Junta of indian
> husbands and his families on this mail ID. This
> follow up won't stop.
>
> Kindly help us restore our faith in you. With
> Trust and Optimism,
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Jinesh Zaveri.
> Mumbai.
>
>
> =======
>
> “A devotee of truth may not do anything in
> deference to convention. He must always hold himself
> open to correction, and whenever he discovers
> himself to be wrong he must confess it all costs and
> atone for it.”
> - Mahatma Gandhi in “My Experiments with Truth” Part
> 4 – Chapter 39.
>
> Also Visit My Blog
> http://indianhusbands.blogspot.com post your
> comments
> Major Sites: www.saveindianfamily.org,
> www.mynation.net, www.498a.org.
>
>
> Mumbai helpline: 9224 335577
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
> to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>

Sachit Dalal
+91-9871734980 (Limited Contact Hours)
My favourite websites :
www.mynation.net; www.saveindianfamily.org
Read latest News at www.mynation.net/mynews
Report Dowry Abuse here : http://mynation.net/demand
Report Dowry Law Misuse : http://mynation.net/db
Disclamer : These are my personal views.Your views could be different.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Central Jail Number Six - over 26% of the female prisoners in Tihar

Central Jail Number Six - over 26% of the female
prisoners in Tihar

Ref :
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1910510.cms

AND

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1910510,curpg-2.cms

NEW DELHI: The mother-in-law, that lumbering bearer of
many keys and grudges, has a special place

not only in Balaji Telefilms but also in Tihar jail.

A portion of Central Jail Number Six is dedicated to
housing women accused in dowry-related

atrocities. Endearingly called the saas-nanad
barracks, the special prison is a cluster of

melancholic cells flanking a corridor leading to a
courtyard.

About 1,200 mothers-in-law and sisters-in-law of dead
and living victims enter this cell every

year and almost an equal number either get bail or are
released.

At the moment, there are about 120 in-laws here, over
26% of the female prisoners in Tihar. They

are chiefly semi-literate women from Delhi and the
villages around who spend their days weeping,

milling around any casual visitor to describe the
treachery of the girls side, praying in serious

groups, listening to religious lectures, and making
bags for social workers.

They even observe karva chauth, and for some reason,
according to information officer Sunil

Gupta, they love primetime soaps despite the frequent
triumphs of the young wife in those plots.

Mothers-in-law who are over 60 grimly accept the
privileges of being old 400 grams of milk,

butter and eggs on most days.

The idea to separate the perennially stunned in-laws,
usually first-time criminals, from more

seasoned female inmates, was conceived when Kiran Bedi
was the Inspector General of prisons, but

the mother-in-law barracks were born some time in
2000.

There is wisdom in the move to sequester the in-laws.
Some of these women are, without doubt,

murderers. They did kill young women who came to their
house in hope. But an overwhelming

majority are inside for mental torture.

They may be bad persons like many women we know but
not professional criminals the way prison

authorities understand the term. Bedi says that she
did not want veterans in immoral trafficking

and kidnapping to influence those arrested in
dowry-related cases. But the mother-in-law barracks

have become a howling island from where old and young
women beg for release.

Several police officials confirm that there is a
growing trend of the girls side putting almost

all the family members of the boys side in prison and
negotiating release money that runs into

lakhs.

Many times, enterprising daughters-in-law, even from
far-flung villages, use the benevolence of

law to teach a lesson to their mothers-in-law by
accusing them of torture. Over 90% of the

in-laws who arrive in the barracks get bail. A
minuscule portion has been convicted. Just about

10 among those in the cells right now have been given
a sentence.

Many of them cannot comprehend the illegality of dowry
or their harassment of the bride. It was a

culture that they had seen all around them, and had
suffered in silence when they were young.

The complexity of bringing law into the traditional
fault lines between women is disturbing the

conscience of jail officials. And not everybody who is
cautiously sympathetic to the jailed

in-laws is male.

I wouldnt know in percentage terms but I can say that
there are several cases of women arrested

in dowry-related cases who turn out to be innocent or
their crimes have been exaggerated, says

Kiran Bedi.

The cruel harassment that young women face today is a
very real issue but what exactly

constitutes abetment to suicide is never clearly
defined. These days, the police are afraid of

being accused of being insensitive to women. So, when
the girls side files a complaint, there is

a tendency to make quick arrests.

But the evil of dowry with its lasting scepters of
charred girls has no other remedy but to raise

a system in which it is easy for a woman to put her
cruel in-laws in jail.

It is inevitable that such a system will send to the
mother-in-law barracks, along with real

murderers and torturers, aging women who had probably
done nothing to deserve imprisonment.

When Diya was arrested, her son was about three months
old. Her sister-in-law had been admitted

in a hospital for burns. One hour after admission, she
said that she had suffered the burns while

cooking. Her condition improved and she returned to
her family.

A few weeks later, due to improper care, she died of
an infection. Before that she gave a second

statement implicating Diya and others from her
husbands family. Diya was 23 when she was

arrested. That was five years ago.

Sunita was an adolescent when she was arrested nine
years ago for burning her sisterin-law who

eventually died. Sunita is serving a life sentence in
the special cell and she still maintains

that she was in her village far away when the incident
occurred.

Sunita and Diya are among the many who wail when
anyone visits the cell, especially a senior

police officer or a new social worker.

Through prayers and handicraft, they survive the days.
But convictions are rare in dowry cases,

especially for harassment charges.
The numbers of the more transient inmates though, the
bulk of the population here, are growing

every year.

Sachit Dalal
+91-9871734980 (Limited Contact Hours)
My favourite websites :
www.mynation.net; www.saveindianfamily.org
Read latest News at www.mynation.net/mynews
Report Dowry Abuse here : http://mynation.net/demand
Report Dowry Law Misuse : http://mynation.net/db
Disclamer : These are my personal views.Your views could be different.